Results 1 ... 35 found in all logged channels for 'theorems to prove'

(pest) asciilifeform: generally, the point of a horror show like that is if one insists on trying to prove theorems re the behaviour of $clockwork
(pest) asciilifeform: oligarchs dun ~have~ to smoke dope. tho does appear to be a 'professional disease' of moneyed idlers with 'no theorems to prove'(tm)(r)(p.erdos)
(asciilifeform) dulapbot: Logged on 2022-03-31 23:12:51 asciilifeform: 'because they have no theorems to prove'(tm)(r)(p.erdos)
(asciilifeform) asciilifeform: 'because they have no theorems to prove'(tm)(r)(p.erdos)
(trilema) mp_en_viaje: refered to as "a soul" when contrasted with that drawing of replicants, or "theorems to prove" when discussing the lost to nativity.
(trilema) a111: Logged on 2017-10-27 17:56 mircea_popescu: anyway, no theorems isn't it. there's that famous case of my driver whom my mother (who was bumming a ride) asked in shock why'd he'd go around playing valet for a 17yo. he said something like "not everyone's a big deal". man had 0 theorems to prove, but also didn't go around deluding himself on the matter.
(trilema) mircea_popescu: asciilifeform period mp had exactly 0 theorems to prove.
(trilema) mircea_popescu: anyway, no theorems isn't it. there's that famous case of my driver whom my mother (who was bumming a ride) asked in shock why'd he'd go around playing valet for a 17yo. he said something like "not everyone's a big deal". man had 0 theorems to prove, but also didn't go around deluding himself on the matter.
(trilema) asciilifeform: people with 'no theorems to prove' rot, whether grinding coffee is motorized or with pestle.
(trilema) asciilifeform: http://btcbase.org/log/2017-03-20#1629753 << the world of 'neuro-typical' folx who have 'no theorems to prove', and nothing with which to legitimately to busy themselves, is ugly indeed. these people oughta be occupied with raising ~actual~ chickens etc.
(trilema) ben_vulpes: theorems to prove, belts to change...
(trilema) mircea_popescu: why can't it just be "there's people with theorems to prove still ; and their cocks won't suck themselves" ?
(trilema) mircea_popescu: or maybe have other theorems to prove.
(trilema) mircea_popescu: no theorems to prove.
(trilema) mircea_popescu: i didn't go to school every morning i knew the other kids would show up because "i had theorems to prove"
(trilema) mircea_popescu: that's the fucking thing there. "some people have no theorems to prove ; most people have no friends that'd know a proof"
(trilema) mircea_popescu: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=15-02-2016#1406191 << that's not it. some people have WHOM TO PROVE THEOREMS TO!
(trilema) assbot: Logged on 15-02-2016 18:04:21; asciilifeform: it suggests that erdos was right, most people 'have no theorems to prove', the idiot social stotting game ~is~ the point of living, to them.
(trilema) asciilifeform: it suggests that erdos was right, most people 'have no theorems to prove', the idiot social stotting game ~is~ the point of living, to them.
(trilema) asciilifeform: the sheer and obvious futility of the standardization process, as it existed then and there, selected against the smart, the intellectually honest, and in general anybody 'with theorems to prove'
(trilema) asciilifeform: (and i find it very strange that an adult would play a solitaire, it seems like a serious symptom of 'has no theorems to prove')
(trilema) ascii_rear: http://log.bitcoin-assets.com/?date=02-01-2016#1359106 << it only works on folks 'with no theorems to prove'
(trilema) adlai: better theorems to prove :)
(trilema) assbot: Logged on 01-12-2015 20:42:08; assbot: 8 results for 'theorems to prove' : http://s.b-a.link/?q=theorems+to+prove
(trilema) assbot: 8 results for 'theorems to prove' : http://s.b-a.link/?q=theorems+to+prove
(trilema) adlai: !s theorems to prove
(trilema) mircea_popescu: it also had no theorems to prove.
(trilema) asciilifeform: !s no theorems to prove
(trilema) assbot: 1 results for 'no theorems to prove' : http://s.b-a.link/?q=no+theorems+to+prove
(trilema) mircea_popescu: guess what ? that guy's still got theorems to prove.
(trilema) asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: re: 'incel' article: what i always found interesting is that we always hear from the fellow who has yet to 'learn a skill become good at it' and not from the one who never learned how to safely unscrew the fuse on a woman because he had theorems to prove.
(trilema) asciilifeform: a fellow 'with theorems to prove' could easily put 1000 years to good use.
(trilema) asciilifeform: to paraphrase paul erdos, 'they have no theorems to prove'
(trilema) asciilifeform: mircea_popescu: you had 'theorems to prove.' these fellows don't.