Results 1 ... 31 found in asciilifeform for 'regrind'
phf: one thing about vtools, i discovered that gnat has code formatting tool, which produces better result than janky emacs indent. i kind of want to regrind vtools for it, but will obviously also break sigs from people who are no longer with us
signpost: oughta be able to drop the existing vpatches of other projects into this, and only have to write a "pbuild" file for them, not also regrind patches.
billymg just went to press a new patch for the crawler and realized there's a typo in the root directory, will have to regrind the first two
asciilifeform: http://logs.nosuchlabs.com/log/asciilifeform/2022-01-30#1077332 << unless we throw out the manifests thing (doing which has own potential minefields) the coordination overhead of '1 tree' would be quite lethal (e.g. 'hey you gotta regrind yer postgres patch, cuz i changed the default sound card config 5min ago')
signpost: I've opted for latter to avoid regrind hell when folks disagree about what they want on their systems, but curious if others disagree.
billymg: caught a bug in my crawler's genesis though, where two of the sql queries use a different index name than the one that gets defined when initializing from bitdash_schema.sql. i'll post a regrind of the genesis soon but if anyone runs into it the fix is to change the two instances of 'ON CONFLICT ON CONSTRAINT unique_host DO UPDATE SET' to 'ON CONFLICT ON CONSTRAINT
dulapbot: Logged on 2021-08-19 19:44:28 asciilifeform: billymg: i'd appreciate if you were to fix the things that you have broken. otherwise i'ma have to regrind on top of my original.
asciilifeform: billymg: i'd appreciate if you were to fix the things that you have broken. otherwise i'ma have to regrind on top of my original.
snsabot: Logged on 2021-06-30 11:57:58 billymg: http://logs.nosuchlabs.com/log/asciilifeform/2021-06-30#1041812 << if new patches are going to be written, have you had a chance to review the two i published yet? i'd be happy to make updates/regrind if either are offensive enough to prevent patching on top of them
billymg: http://logs.nosuchlabs.com/log/asciilifeform/2021-06-30#1041812 << if new patches are going to be written, have you had a chance to review the two i published yet? i'd be happy to make updates/regrind if either are offensive enough to prevent patching on top of them
asciilifeform: the latter is available on his old www.
asciilifeform: whaack: actually there may be sumthing wrong w/ these last 2 re: the manifest diff. will examine & regrind if necessary.
asciilifeform: trinque: back to thread -- if you end up regrinding genesis in near future, plox to throw in 'manifest.txt' -- seems to be missing
adlai: a form of 'regrind' in the cool kids' version control system
asciilifeform: mod6: if you want to regrind, may be clearer to replace the if (pfrom) ... w/ if (pfrom != NULL) ...
asciilifeform: ( specifically, if he comes back w/ a regrind where each patch adds the appropriate note to the manifest, rather than all in one, i'ma respect it & sign ~that~ , after verifying that errything else (save for that uniturd byte in genesis) matches the historic tree
asciilifeform: shinohai: i'ma post these & the rest once mod6 returns w/ the tail-end regrind discussed earlier
asciilifeform: then welcome to go ahead & regrind w/ the others, if it is a candidate for mod6's official set. in either case i'ma sign the patches that are in use on my nodes, and post the sigs (w/ links to orig. publication on ml)
asciilifeform: mod6: iirc no one but me is using atm 'who-gave', so i'ma regrind it.
mod6: Or is it your preference to regrind your own vpatch? Just don't want to duplicate work.
mod6: Now, I'm going to regrind 'whogave', is that separate from what you are going to do? Are you going to add/subtract something else from the vpatch as it currently stands/
asciilifeform: mod6: plox lemme know when you have these reground, i'd like to regrind 'whogave' to align.
asciilifeform: mod6: i was gonna regrind 'who-gave' and harmonize w/ the current official mod6 set, but nao wat.
mod6: I've never hit that error when building my keccak regrind, or traditional SHA512 tree, fwiw.
trinque: btw mod6, I am trying to build from your keccak regrind. will report results in a bit
shinohai: It has standalone keccak, I used my regrind keccak patches to test it.
asciilifeform: if folx willing to put up with having to regrind patch 3+ times -- as the folx who helped to fix e.g. asciilifeform's logger were -- then can do just about anyffin w/ v as-is. even 'whole universe' tree.
asciilifeform: diana_coman: jfw observed, correctly, that there are patches that in fact asciilifeform wrote, but never signed regrind of
shinohai: I never have had this issue either, even when doing the keccak regrind for trb
shinohai: (using own keccack patchset from regrind earlier this year)