← | Results 9501 ... 9750 found in all logged channels for 'f:diana' | →
(ossasepia) diana_coman: thimbronion: see that comment I left on your blog and maybe answer that there first.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: thimbronion: make that more like 4 hours or write it down and I'll read it around that time.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: thimbronion: are you back from Hawaii?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: heh, all right.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: cool then; and btw, didn't you promise some photos/post of that wonderful view from your place?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: honestly, it sounds like you'd be way better off *without* that, esp since you aren't really lacking holidays otherwise; maybe meet the guys sometime in CR before/after that trip rather than sink those days in it.
(trilema) diana_coman: onth krankenwhatevs sounds even better to me.
(trilema) diana_coman: mp_en_viaje: yeah, it's lobbes' rebranded blog
(ossasepia) diana_coman: http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/ossasepia/2019-10-26#1007641 - thank you trinque for stating this clearly for jfw ; he certainly has other things to do atm.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/ossasepia/2019-10-26#1007633 - is this the sort of fun that keeps you going or the sort that means you'll need a few days *after it* to be able to do anything useful again?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: no, it exists, just that it's usually a separate post and so more like review & plan; your / there raised an eyebrow.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: all right; and don't spin/mull internally only, better come and speak up in here, yes?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: review != plan so hm, what are you publishing there?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: all right; clear and fine for this Sunday?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: and now I realise you might all think I'm anyway 90 or something, lolz.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: but there is also the waste of your own time for sure.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: that is one side of it for sure and yes, it's the one mainly covered in http://ossasepia.com/2018/02/06/its-only-words-and-assumptions-and-priorities-and-ouch/
(ossasepia) diana_coman: because you know, I can let you slide and take a whole month on one post; at that rate possibly we'll get to have a look at your software sometime before I die of old age or something.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: crises are a different thing, not relevant here.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: you do understand though that it's your time first and foremost at stake here, yes?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: now I hope you don't go to... check, lol.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: were you always on time (and without last minute mad rush) there?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: you clearly answered the time-irrespective part, kind of side-stepped on the writing/not-sexy work.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: basically school was last time when you really had too little time to indulge in wasting it.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: have you always worked like this time-irrespective or is this just for writing/not-sexy work?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: apparently you're due a re-read of it.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: on younghands you'll still have to do the plan for next week but really do set aside in your own schedule time for each of the things (and even for your own otherwise, wtf, time is not some infinite resource); so far I'll still consider it's not absolutely necessary for you to publish that too but if you insist, it will become.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: that goes on your blog
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: mk; you finish that outline and publish it (or whatever sad-unfinished-outline you have by Sunday evening) + the relevant notes or whatever else you got sidetracked into; if you get sidetracked even more, you publish still tomorrow that too, whatever it is, all in one post.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: heh, really? you didn't know all of a sudden what you had?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: you know, start valuing your time more, there's not even a single second of it that you'll ever get back
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: why so slow in answering anyway, it's not like I asked you complicated questions, is it?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: say something.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: what do you have now, an outline or what?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: before that, it would also seem you didn't have anything solid to go on when you said you will do it by Sunday.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/ossasepia/2019-10-26#1007558 - at least the thinking + focus + writing down is certainly not bad, no; re mulling vs spinning ahem, it depends on what exactly you do there, we'll revisit.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/ossasepia/2019-10-26#1007568 - my typo there: what did you do about it (alternatively: how did you go about it); but see ^ , it's the same question.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: so you found out on Tuesday evening you have to write this post by Sunday evening; ok, what happened next (relevant to this, obviously)?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: what did you go about it anyway?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: it is true that *some* thinking can and will go on in the background so it doesn't need nor benefit from separate time but the writing - esp. when you lack experience and positively avoid it - still takes time of its own.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: at least some time in your schedule set aside for this task
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: did you *plan* any time specifically for the writing ?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/ossasepia/2019-10-26#1007554 - emphasis on *future*, all right? don't "oh, shiny" on it now.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: certainly; no worries.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: BingoBoingo: that ip-flickering does rather force one to get a bouncer, huh; weird stuff.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: eh, and carving davids out of surrounding marble and so on, sure
(ossasepia) diana_coman: funnily enough the very same search was done only recently in #t yielding same result and... still didn't directly pop into memory, such a shame.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: sometimes it's all about getting the right terms to search for, indeed.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: ah, ha; well done dorion !
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: lolz! but you shouldn't tolerate that shit being thrown at you *in your own browser* toilet or not; public toilet means you ban specifically stuff (rather than ban all + admit only selected on human box), certainly not that you tolerate any- and every-thing
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: also, trilema titles are quite a bit like... sirens, lol.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: do you still find "only cryptography" interesting?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: so that was dropped, not sure that there is a trilema article specifically on it; it might be mentioned (I'd expect) in one of the s.mg reports but not in full gory detail (and sadly at the time I didn't dissect it on my blog either)
(ossasepia) diana_coman: ... even in principle)
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: ah, the minigame & OS was triggered by the fact that eulora's client compilation process was in the end still broken by the march of shitgnomes "updating/obsoleting" whatevers; as a response to this, the first attempt was to make a full mirror of some linux distros; I've burnt some time on this but the end result was that's it's effectively insane (huge size that just can't be justified in any possible way, let alone digested ...
(ossasepia) diana_coman: but there's still quite a way to go to get there for sure.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: re vpatches in general yes, ideally *all* software that runs on my machine would be V-pressed entirely and I could then perhaps sleep better.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw btw are you familiar with Cuntoo at all and esp ^ ?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: trinque took a very elegant approach there, namely he produced a cuntoo bootstrapper that can effectively run entirely offline (if one gets all tarballs in place too) and produces as a result the genesis.vpatch *that matches trinque's sig*; ie he provides only the sig as a way for you to verify that what the script produced on your machine is *the same thing* as he produced.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: are you at all familiar with cuntoo and its genesis.vpatch?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: BingoBoingo_: what's going on with your connection that it's so flimsy lately?
(trilema) diana_coman: it does sound like BingoBoingo enjoys paralegal more than datacentres at least.
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: you know, I already told you that I *want to pay you*, no free testing, all right?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: good then; so far it's not necessary and I hope it stays this way.
(ossasepia) diana_coman is seriously considering making 15 minutes daily chat part of jfw's weekly plan otherwise
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: works; hopefully you *will* just ask in here if/when stuck and without me prodding why-you-so-silent, yes/
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: well, finish this one, review how it went & what time it ate, plan the next and see if 2nd fits; what sort of time do you have available this coming week anyway? (ie for work that I get to see)
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: all right; are you fine re plan for next week?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: asciilifeform: I'll read it whenever it's finished.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: yes, the format is entirely up to you; where are you with that time-consuming curriculum-dev otherwise?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: yw; and don't worry, I got what you meant there.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: all right then
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: yes, it was better as I could see what you had and where you were; and take heart, you do at least make it quite hard for people to *not* want to work with you.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: how's your writing going?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: aha; you'll probably end up hearing more of him anyway but yes, I got curious mainly because of survey of algebra since I can't quite see what sort of survey of algebra would leave him out.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: then do that and we talk on Tuesday evening.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: can you type them in and publish them in a single post by Sunday ?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: is there more to those fabled outlines than the list of topics you published in this last post?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: so I gather your original outlines on which you based the estimate "5 articles by Sunday" was that list there?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: knowing when you have understood *enough* to move further is part of practice too, yes; indeed, there is no limit to "deeper understanding" and precisely because of that + finite resource time, you *have to* practice figuring this out too (+ the other part of this: making the *most* of what you know at any given time)
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: the previous discussion there holds the key to that but yes, it's a side road atm and a bit to travel down it too so file it under "to revisit" and come back to it another time.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: heh, how exactly do you imagine one fully ever controls the full environment?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: funnily enough for the exact thing it's not even about Galois himself really.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: the log-lines references in fact earlier discussion at about http://btcbase.org/log/2015-11-10#1321513
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: here's a more direct discussion of identity (but again: do not get lost in the context of *that*): http://trilema.com/2014/its-not-the-sauce-its-the-poultry-and-other-metamathematical-considerations/#footnote_0_52317
(ossasepia) diana_coman: now I'm curious though: jfw do you know about Galois?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: and then some more! but yes, kind of why "don't get lost " in there
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: don't get lost in the logs now, lol
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: heh; do you know what the rest of refs in the logs right before that cited line are?
(trilema) diana_coman: if only they also had internet in autumn ?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: since I didn't specify the length to start with, it means that choice is left to you.
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: thank you, that comment certainly works better there (and answered!); no idea re node in kiev.
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: mah, I got that wrong, it was !1 subscribe not follow.
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: all you need to do is to tell feedbot !1 follow loper-os/comments/feed or whatever the rss is; re your blog I suspect the comments-in-here is precisely because of the xor hurdle.
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: ah, and now I think I got what you meant earlier re feedbot-comments and yes: I have feedbot announcing to me in private the comments on my blog too, certainly; works great, too!
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: uhm, do you mean that blog-comments belong in the #t logs?
(trilema) diana_coman: I'm just puzzled by the choice, nothing more.
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: no, but why not just comment there?
(trilema) diana_coman: http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2019-10-24#1947996 - also, wouldn't this have belonged as a comment there really? or some reason to comment on... feedbot's announcements?
(trilema) diana_coman: http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2019-10-24#1947998 - yes, sometimes namely when it fits/is easy given their current setup and so on; certainly.
(trilema) diana_coman: I really suspect this would have been an asciilifeform-like reply only, though.
(trilema) diana_coman: http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2019-10-24#1947996 - that would have been such an outlier reply that I'd have at least taken the time to both talk in more detail to the guy AND report it for sure; can confirm: no, nobody came anywhere close to replying such a thing.
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: the exact list of who forgot when or if "only i forgot".
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: yes, mp always remembers it; he's been so far the exception though ( I had to ask for the fp from pizarro; I had to ask for it from mivocloud etc); still unclear how is this detailed account relevant but anyways.
(trilema) diana_coman: BingoBoingo: fwiw those new lawyers sound worse-than-useless to me, the type that will do their fixed and ineffective act but on your money.
(trilema) diana_coman: http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/trilema/2019-10-23#1947931 - this is something I end up asking for ~each time I get a new server; not sure why it's always forgotten.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: shrysr: yes, meant mp-wp compatible; from what you say, it should work.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: is V-reading at least interesting?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: so you know, leave it for another day, ok? you have loads to do anwyay.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: re "why"... does MP even say why in there? lolz
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: shades and whiskers of meaning there it might seem perhaps but they matter.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: so no, it does not imply absolute truth ; and in turn, absolute truth says precisely "you can't negate this meaningfully" BUT it does not imply that you can't find a domain where it just doesn't apply at all.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: a statement being universally valid means that you'll find it in all domains; onth it doesn't yet say that you can't meaningfully *negate* it
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: well yes; otherwise indeed, no need for both
(ossasepia) diana_coman: each of "absolutely true" and "universally valid" brings its own bit to the table, hence why MP lists both of them: he is *not* repeating himself there, lolz.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: do you see the difference there?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: onth universally valid means that they also *apply* everywhere ie you can't meaningfully reason outside of their influence.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: absolute there is opposed to conventional and being absolutely true means that you can't meaningfully negate them.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: hmmm, not opposable means that they reflect slightly different aspects
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: based on what, that hunch?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: I do like your new-found thoroughness; so I'll cut short your proof-misery: note that your iff statement is yet another thing, namely a double implication !
(ossasepia) diana_coman: the why... oh my.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: possibly start with in your own words what absolutely true, universally valid and fundamentally correct *mean*
(trilema) diana_coman: BingoBoingo: ahahaha, how is that?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: btw, your question is not about formal logic but still about philosophical categories mainly; not that it can hurt reading more on formal logic too if that's problematic for you but just so you know that it won't likely solve *this* problem.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: yes, the deadline for the new policy is by convention April but in principle any time before that.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: sounds all good.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: you have in the footnotes everything you need
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: well, follow the definitions for each and see; the best method is to work through the proof really.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack: hm, sounds like you didn't quite follow the explanations in the footnotes there; he's not opposing "absolutely true" to "universally valid" because those are not opposable, they are just different facets ie absolutely (true) as opposed to conventionally (true) + universally (valid) as opposed to domain-specific (valid)
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: probably for the best too! this is on *him* to spend more time on before it can be of any use (if it can be of any use), not on you; and pretty please, don't go "shiny!!" at it, it's not helping him either.
(trilema) diana_coman: asciilifeform: yes, he has *something*; it's still on the to-figure-out list just what and so on; I'll update if/when something useful but not earlier and there's still quite a lot to clarify there even before spending any time on any code.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: asciilifeform: morning; and no worries re bot & vpatch; also, wb snsabot !
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: let me know if there's any weird/problem with the account.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: I also rated you with deedbot, you should be able to see it via pm eg /msg deedbot !!reputation jfw ; the website (wot.deedbot.org) takes some time to update iirc; atm my rating might still enable you to !!up yourself in #trilema but I suggest abstaining from it for now.
(trilema) diana_coman: !!v 18779896B0CEDC6A551886AAA53DCD69A9E374A62070031D467E894273BE635D
(trilema) diana_coman: spyked: I think it was initially tailor-made for trb really, hence the odd stuff.
(trilema) diana_coman: spyked: ha, that vpatch is interesting, I never really used the init part.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw dorion you might want to use feedbot to follow blogs (posts and/or comments), just pm it eg /msg feedbot !1 help
(ossasepia) diana_coman: whaack you blog that.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: shrysr whaack get yourselves a proper avatar on your blog, will you? mp-wp will use whatever you have as avatar.png on your domain eg mine is http://ossasepia.com/avatar.png
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: for that matter it would be quite useful to you to look back and structure the whole thing + write it up for later, it's been close to a month anyway by now.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: that would be a 2nd post, namely write-up your experience from stumbling on #o to now; on post 1 though focus on the adventures to bringing blog online, it's enough for one post.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: and then you publish it, that's it; if it sucks, it's ok, you'll get told in clear enough terms.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: and no, don't agonize; see the 3-steps process: 1. write down *the draft without worrying about everything at once* 2. proofread and basic revision 3. *after some time, at the very least 1 hour* re-read and do ONE proper, full revision if/as needed
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: http://fixpoint.welshcomputing.com/2019/hello-world/?b=illustrate&end=#select - that bit there is such a bunch of avoidance that you'd better start with the illustration mentioned
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: all right; I'll take you on; I'll set you up with an account on yh by the end of this week; meanwhile you still have at least 1 article to write&publish on your blog for sure.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: anyway, given your long time on the fence (that wasn't spent idly from what I could see) + http://logs.ossasepia.com/log/ossasepia/2019-10-15#1006462 , I'm inclined to think you know it's not just "get out" if/when inconvenient
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: it's not just noise, more a matter of knowing what is whose worry really; it's not serving anyone (and you especially) well to confuse the roles really.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: (and lol, do you think I wouldn't just say precisely "will reflect and let you know" and/or ask the questions I needed?)
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: do you get what the WoT is and how it works?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: indeed; the issue though is one of commitment really, esp since by taking you on I have to take on this bridge-that-gap thing that is potentially very charged.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: and more to the point, I *can* make mistakes too; your bet and hope there is that my mistakes are less worse than yours and/or my recovery from them is better than yours.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: as long as you don't think I'm some sort of perfection, it might even work.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: why/how come you think I'm anyway able to help you with such a thing?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: ahahah, computer choices are at most some specific application of values, not themselves values, lolz.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: or are those still to be found (ie do you just mean there harmony basically)?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: (works as a one thing; not too broad for that, no)
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: what are your professed values?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: re languages it's ok, I wanted to get some idea of exposure & types more than anything else.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: what is what you want most (ONE thing) out of the effort I'll ask from you in here?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: what progr languages do you know anyway?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: ahaha, not bad as an answer at least.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: on the tech side, how dearly are you married to strictly your stuff there?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: asciilifeform: he's quite hang up on chronicling too, no worries :))
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: well, you've been talking here for hours, what are you on about!
(ossasepia) diana_coman: or at least that's how it seems from here
(ossasepia) diana_coman: asciilifeform: you evaluate the tech very well and even prod it at length; but you don't particularly see the need for that to talk to the guys who made it and/or "ah, they won't answer anyway" etc.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: asciilifeform: funny how you say that when it maps so close to some of your hangups, lolz.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: what was your plan anyway re this? since I remember you did have some intention this year at least to introduce yourself
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: I don't know if you appreciate this but you can't just pop in with "hi guyz, here's my OS"
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: now the trouble is this gap that you accumulated and quite knowingly/with intention over those past few years; eg on one hand good enough to buy fg 2-3 years ago but somehow not good enough to say hi at the very least.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: that in itself is certainly not a bad idea as far as I can see; the unclear/dubious part was re mid/long-term vision; but anyway, you're focused mainly on the tech I gather so possibly not all that clear on that part.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: if you don't actually know, that's an answer too.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: I don't quite get what you are trying there.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: so are you educating your market there or how do you see this?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: what trade is that meant to be re "longer term trade relationships"? more/further training or what?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: o.O did you buy FG or make your own from the schematics or what?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: so what's the decent hardware & software option?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: now go and see to your draft and leave jfw alone for a bit, will you?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: ha! well don1
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: I was just amused because it's such a ...how to put it, an old story if you will; don't worry now about it though.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: oh boy; next I'll hear he sent you to London/somewhere to work with his good-friend there on some business and then it just..somehow, did not work out; lolz.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: such parts don't appear in a ...vacuum, I think you said, remember?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: all right; what is the current biz ?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: ahahaha, doesn't that sound familiar.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: so this still involved ira?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: for the logs: hanbot's posts aka MPOE-PR on bitcointalk.org , see http://trilema.com/2013/mpoe-pr-almost-two-years-in-the-swamp-an-anthology/
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: except finance is not at all only tech; sigh.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: since you had followed even the bitbet story at the time, hadn't you stumbled upon hanbot's posts?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: serves you right for earlier jfw-prodding :P
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: as to your business idea 1. it's not yet fully clear what it was 2. at least you had the sense to draft in someone with some finance experience (or so it seems)
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: yes; ira's idea.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: was this dorion's idea+plan & he drafted you in for the tech or what was your role in it?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: does jfw's eval above sound right to you too?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: ftr that idea sounds about as inept as what I've heard from reading uni students only quite recently.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: well, money and timing, lol.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: awww, saving his skin there.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: followed the bitbet drama; then?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: so now you get to answer: why would that be good to mention?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: dorion: yo, mention here if you have mentions, don't prod him behind the scenes! lolz
(ossasepia) diana_coman: that means -> have no idea.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: I guess ~everything is pretty perplexing from the outside.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: heh, good for you.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: ok, give me the main milestones from 2014 on and how you ended up ...uhm, teaching people or is that training or what?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: did you buy btc in 2014 or how come you got to it anyway?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: what market is that?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: but anyway, ok; so 2014, met coinapult via dorion but not sucked into it; and then?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: well uhm, to the extent it was just remote work, I don't quite see how/why was it your own thing; it was...their thing.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: at least very useful sysadmin/work if they wanted you even remote.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: where/what sort of remote work?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: what was your own thing?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: were you just living out of your savings at that point or what?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: ok; landed in Panama without much of a concrete plan otherwise I gather; gobbled up Spanish and basic stuff as quickly as possible; what came you way then?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: asciilifeform: ^ :P
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: why/how come Panama of all places?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: ahahaha; right.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: all right; sysadmin; and then?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: so at the time your plan was to save some money and then ..?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: was this work still close to your parents' home/were you still in the same environment out of office hours?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: mathematical analysis, it's a branch; but go ahead.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: so ok at algebra; barely literate at analysis, is that it?
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: fwiw writing is certainly pre-uni skill in any sane place.
(ossasepia) diana_coman: jfw: o.O how is that great in CS without...maths??
← | →
Download hourly DB snapshot | Get Source Code