: mp_en_viaje: ack. This'll give me time to prep the thing anyways
: bvt: why does your vpatch
cancel a line from the manifest? To my mind this doesn't quite make sense - if you want to revert to a previous point, that means simply branching the tree from a previous node so using *that* manifest, doesn't it?
: maybe I'm not fully getting the idea of the manifest file here but my current understanding is that it's a record of the history and as such I really don't see any case where something gets deleted from it - at most it gets branched from a previous version but that's still an added line to (a previous version of) the manifest file.
: diana_coman: ty for spotting this. i will regring vpatches p.1 and p.2; i wanted to make the vpatch p.1 name the same in manifest and file system, but did the wrong thing there just editing the line from previous vpatch in vpatch p.2.
: Logged on 2020-02-05 22:50:12 mircea_popescu: well, hm. maybe it's time to re-iterate this point
, especially seeing how diana_coman 's recent work
: perhaps mod6 takes the lead to implement the clearsigned scheme on his keccak regrind
of the trb tree.
: jfw is expecting
to finish the offline side of Gales Bitcoin Wallet this week, so his development plate will be clearing a bit. He has an unpublished patch to trb to simplify the build system on Gales, so checking/working with mod6 and getting his patch published could be his next priority. Among other simplifications
: I'll let him show and tell, his patch removes the whole rotor orchestra since Gales is musl static anyway.
: spyked is rebuilding trb
shortly, so if mod6 leads the way, followed by jfw and spyked that's at least 3 people scrutinizing the clearsigning scheme, tools and likely many of the same patches within the same timeframe.