shinohai[asciilifeform]: $ticker btc usd
busybot[asciilifeform]: Current BTC price in USD: $21401.94
billymg[asciilifeform]: !c trb-status
crawlerbot[asciilifeform]: 75.106.222.93 (Alive), h=744158, v=99999, United States - peers: 267 - last probed: 4m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform]: 208.94.240.42 (Alive), h=744157, v=99999, United States - peers: 134 - last probed: 5m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform]: 82.79.58.192 (Alive), h=744157, v=99999, Romania - peers: 108 - last probed: 5m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform]: 85.164.243.42 (Alive), h=744157, v=99999, Norway - peers: 79 - last probed: 7m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform|asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: 205.134.172.6 (Alive), h=744157, v=99999, United States - peers: 23 - last probed: 5m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform|asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: 94.176.238.102 (Alive), h=743777, v=99999, Lithuania - peers: 19 - last probed: 5m ago
crawlerbot[4]: 205.134.172.26 (Alive), h=744157, v=99999, United States - peers: 15 - last probed: 5m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform|asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: 205.134.172.4 (Alive), h=744157, v=70001, United States - peers: 36 - last probed: 5m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: 71.114.46.117 (Alive), h=744157, v=99999, United States - peers: 37 - last probed: 7m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: 54.38.94.63 (Alive), h=744157, v=88888, France - peers: 54 - last probed: 5m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform|asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: 205.134.172.28 (Alive), h=744157, v=99999, United States - peers: 18 - last probed: 5m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: 54.39.156.171 (Alive), h=744157, v=99999, Canada - peers: 65 - last probed: 5m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: 185.254.196.12 (Alive), h=255579, v=99999, United States - peers: 44 - last probed: 6m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform|asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: 205.134.172.27 (Alive), h=744157, v=99999, United States - peers: 1 - last probed: 5m ago
crawlerbot[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: Bitcoin Network (IPv4 Nodes Active Within the Last 48 hours) Global: 7393; TRB-Compatible: 26; TRB: 14
crawlerbot[asciilifeform]: TRB by Country: United States: 9; Canada: 1; Romania: 1; Lithuania: 1; France: 1; Norway: 1;
crawlerbot[asciilifeform]: TRB-Compatible by Country: United States: 7; Germany: 4; Romania: 3; Singapore: 2; United Kingdom: 2; Brazil: 1; Ukraine: 1; Australia: 1; Italy: 1; France: 1; Sweden: 1; Belgium: 1; Bulgaria: 1;
billymg[asciilifeform|asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: !c net-summary
billymg[asciilifeform]: btw if anyone here (or any log readers) don't have a trb node running yet, it was stupid easy using pentacle
billymg[asciilifeform]: i literally just took the binary that pentacle spit out, threw it on the server, and ran it -- no extra tweaking necessary (other than a few -addnode flags passed at startup to seed it with peers)
signpost[asciilifeform]: glad it's working out!
busybot[asciilifeform]: Current BTC price in USD: $21782.19
busybot[asciilifeform]: Current BTC price in USD: $21792.68
billymg[asciilifeform]: was about to propose updating those with pentacle build instructions
busybot[asciilifeform]: Current BTC price in USD: $21813.32
billymg[asciilifeform]: the network's not far off from where the only "trb compat" nodes will be actual trb nodes, so would be nice to get more running
billymg[asciilifeform]: maybe even include a signed static binary on trb.org, for those who really just want point-and-click
busybot[asciilifeform]: Current BTC price in USD: $21812.23
billymg[asciilifeform]: yes, busybot, we know the price is going up
signpost[asciilifeform]: probably hold off on recommending pentacle as it's lacking a proper website and instructions yet.
signpost[asciilifeform] plans to put some work into those in the next few wks.
whaack[asciilifeform]: thebitcoin.foundation is down
whaack[asciilifeform]: has been for a couple days, not sure if reported in any chan yet
whaack[asciilifeform]: derp, read then talk
mod6[asciilifeform]: i like this crawlerbot
mod6[asciilifeform]: signpost: *thumbsup*
mod6[asciilifeform]: who host's the site these days?
asciilifeform: mod6, whaack : was still pointing to jurov's ancient copy. i'ma stand up a new one.
asciilifeform currently has the dnsisms
mod6[asciilifeform]: ahh, didn't realize he was still hosting the website.
mod6[asciilifeform]: asciilifeform: a++
whaack[asciilifeform]: anyone have a guide for connecting asciilifeform's bot to pestnet? any extra steps necessary? about to attempt
asciilifeform: whaack: logotron ? see billymg's www
asciilifeform: http://therealbitcoin.com nao points to the new www; http://therealbitcoin.org and http://thebitcoin.foundation still propagating
asciilifeform: mod6, whaack , et al: oughta work nao (or shortly, when propagates), plox to ping asciilifeform if not.
asciilifeform updated section 'irc' finally, lol
asciilifeform updated w/ pestism info
asciilifeform removed the long-dead #ba link (afaik is wholly subsumed in existing logotrons)
asciilifeform replaced ancient static noades list w/ link to billymg's thing
asciilifeform: wb phf
whaack[asciilifeform]: asciilifeform: awesome, looks like source code browser is down atm
asciilifeform: whaack: iirc shinohai currently has login to that box ( it's in asciilifeform's rack ), possibly can fix
asciilifeform: otherwise we'll replace (high time anyways)
phf[asciilifeform]: i have this running on a roaming
asciilifeform: phf: nifty
phf[asciilifeform]: ..and i need to eval some forms to see last messages, but it's chugging along
asciilifeform: a++. phf even if not 100% 'for the ages' quality, consider to post; a cl pestron is a major win imho
shinohai[asciilifeform]: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2022-07-08#1008566 << Fixed, that'll be 1 bitcent please.
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2022-07-08 14:43:02 asciilifeform[billymg]: whaack: iirc shinohai currently has login to that box ( it's in asciilifeform's rack ), possibly can fix
asciilifeform: shinohai: makes asciilifeform nostalgic for ye olde deedbot wallet, then could actually give bitcent...
shinohai[asciilifeform]: deedbot wallet was truly one-of-kind service.
asciilifeform: verily
shinohai[asciilifeform]: $uptime
busybot[asciilifeform]: The bot has been up for: 19 days 10 minutes and 30 seconds
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: is there a command line arg to not run getdata on connect?
billymg[asciilifeform]: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2022-07-08#1008562 << for this link, it might be helpful to add the GET params status=alive and returned_peers=true, e.g. http://bitdash.io/nodes/?status=alive&user_agent=any&species=TRB-Compat&returned_peers=true
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2022-07-08 14:39:01 asciilifeform[billymg]: replaced ancient static noades list w/ link to billymg's thing
whaack[asciilifeform]: billymg: o/
billymg[asciilifeform]: howdy, whaack
PeterL[asciilifeform]: whaack: I think it was discussed to add a knob for that in the future, but nothing has been added yet
whaack[asciilifeform]: hm alright
whaack[asciilifeform]: i'm about to connect my trbexplorer here and i wanted to forgo all the spam
PeterL[asciilifeform]: might be useful to connect manually and let the backlog finish rolling in before connecting the bot to the station?
billymg[asciilifeform]: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2022-07-08#1008555 << http://billymg.com/2022/01/new-logotoron-patches-bug-fixes-and-enhancements/#S1-L1
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2022-07-08 14:06:12 whaack[signpost|billymg]: anyone have a guide for connecting asciilifeform's bot to pestnet? any extra steps necessary? about to attempt
billymg[asciilifeform]: more specifically, these are the only lines necessary for making the commands work properly in pest
billymg[asciilifeform]: just to work around the [hearsay] annotations. otherwise asciilifeform's bot worked seamlessly with pestnet out of the box, i didn't have to make any modifications
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e help
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e help
whaack[asciilifeform]: hm can't seem to peer with my bot
billymg[asciilifeform]: whaack: how are you doing the peering?
whaack[asciilifeform]: billymg: in my irc client, i used the various commands %peer trbexplorer, %key trbexplorer mykey, %at trbexplorer ip:port
whaack[asciilifeform]: then for trbexplorer i added an address table file and added the command line param --address-table-path
billymg[asciilifeform]: hm, yeah, same that i do with mine
whaack[asciilifeform]: probably have a typo or something somewhere
phf[asciilifeform]: hmm, that was unintentional
phf[asciilifeform]: does blatta track chains at the moment? i've been sending messages with 0 selfchain, and presumably nothing's been complaining
phf[asciilifeform]: this should be valid seflchain. not that anything anywhere will notice...
awt[asciilifeform]: phf: yes, blatta tracks cahins, but if a message breaks the chain and no GETDATA response arrives, it's still dumped to the client eventually anyway, unmarked.
awt[asciilifeform]: *chains, obv
phf[asciilifeform]: but not in the case of selfchain 0? it just silently treats it as a new chain?
asciilifeform: phf: iirc chains not currently used in blatta at all with exception of triggering 'getdata'
awt[asciilifeform]: phf ah yes - that is true
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: o/
awt[asciilifeform]: hey whaack!
phf[asciilifeform]: Met nebuchadnezzar ! and all that
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt maybe you can help me get my bot online here
asciilifeform: phf: aha, afaik nope
whaack[asciilifeform]: running out of ideas as to why i can't peer my bot with 'whaack'
awt[asciilifeform]: phf: at one time I had a local implementation of all that - was a mess and discarded it. Haven't gotten back to it.
signpost[asciilifeform]: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2022-07-08#1008576 << any future implementation would need to create ambiguity re: who holds privkeys.
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2022-07-08 14:48:41 shinohai[billymg|signpost]: deedbot wallet was truly one-of-kind service.
signpost[asciilifeform]: otherwise one guy's just eating a bunch of externalized risk; same shape problem as led to pest.
signpost[asciilifeform]: but I appreciate the compliment!
awt[asciilifeform]: whaack: hmm. how do you know it's not peered?
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: if i am properly peered, packets should go back and forth between my irc client blatta and bot blatta, regardless of whether the bot has connected to irc and tried to join the channel, correct?
awt[asciilifeform]: whaack: yes correct
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: in my irc client when i type %at i get " trbexplorer 205.134.172.28:7780 no packets received from this address"
whaack[asciilifeform]: one gotcha was i had the wrong ip set in the bot's configs, and updating the address-table i fed on start did not change the actual realnet.db , but i've since resolved that issue, so now i am not sure where to go
whaack[asciilifeform]: on my bot's blatta end the logs only show the 2 lines
whaack[asciilifeform]: INFO 2022-07-08 17:24:44,359: Listening for Pest packets on udp port 7780.
whaack[asciilifeform]: INFO 2022-07-08 17:24:44,360: Listening for IRC connections on port 6670
asciilifeform: signpost: asciilifeform at one pt contemplated a crackpot 'solution' where (sumbody obv. has the privs) but some # of folx store pre-signed tx (of e.g. a bitdime) from x -> y , and these somehow uncorked when req'd
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: or anyone peered with me can you confirm that %at gives you "whaack 198.211.117.133:7780"
awt[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: whaack 198.211.117.133:7780 2022-07-08 14:34:24.698708
whaack[asciilifeform]: ty awt
awt[asciilifeform]: whaack: you can set the LOG_RUBBISH env var to log rubbish messages on your bot station
awt[asciilifeform]: Should report where they're being sent off to, if sent at all
signpost[asciilifeform]: asciilifeform, yep. it'd also be nice to have side channels where conversation doesn't go straight to public loggers.
signpost[asciilifeform]: with >2 participants.
phf[asciilifeform]: http://glyf.org/screenshots/pest-poc.png some assembly required
signpost[asciilifeform]: phf: congrats!
signpost[asciilifeform]: got specific plans for UI, or not yet?
whaack[asciilifeform]: mega congrats phf
signpost[asciilifeform] did some farting around with cl ncurses libs yesterday.
awt[asciilifeform]: phf: nice!
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: nothing being sent , dont see any msg after i ran 'export LOG_RUBBISH=1' and restarted blatta
phf[asciilifeform]: signpost: not plans re ui. ive played with different options, but everything's subpar. and presumably one wants a console version, so some form of vt, and a gui
awt[asciilifeform]: whaack: are you certain it has anything in the AT?
whaack[asciilifeform]: asciilifeform: is it possible udp is not allowed on your server by defrault?
whaack[asciilifeform]: default*
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: i checked the db file at looks good it seems
awt[asciilifeform]: whaack: maybe connect with weechat and do a listing
signpost[asciilifeform]: phf: yep, I didn't love anything yet re: "tui" libs. several of them are basically ncurses ffi with some crap sprinkled on top.
phf[asciilifeform]: i'm thinking of doing a plan9 style approach, where remote pest station just dumps raw messages, but one can connect to it over e.g. ssh using some simple gui, like ltk, and get a semblance of usable experience
phf[asciilifeform]: that is remote station keeps track of state, and you can connect to it with a rich interface of some sort
phf[asciilifeform]: alternatively emacs/swank :D
signpost[asciilifeform]: seems sensible to not couple tightly to a particular client.
signpost[asciilifeform]: huehue, should be good enough!
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: yup, connected with my irc, %at returns
whaack[asciilifeform]: whaack 198.211.117.133:7780 no packets received from this address
awt[asciilifeform]: whaack: in that case odd that you wouldn't be seeing rubbish messages going out in the log
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: i started seeing rubbish messages once i connected my ic client
whaack[asciilifeform]: so looks like the rubbish msgs dont get sent until the client conects
awt[asciilifeform]: ah hmm. must be some condition there based on the client connection existing that I forgot about
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: hmmm quite odd
whaack[asciilifeform]: i got msgs from server
whaack[asciilifeform]: <whaack> 002 Your host is whaack, running Blatta 9976 and Pest 0xFC
whaack[asciilifeform]: on my bot's client
whaack[asciilifeform]: which leads me to believe that they are indeed communicating even though %at says they haven't sent a packet
awt[asciilifeform]: those are sent from the built in irc server on connect only to your irc client.
whaack[asciilifeform]: ah okay
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: didn't you have some trick to test if udp was working?
awt[asciilifeform]: whaack: at one point I resorted to using tcpdump
awt[asciilifeform]: you could set it up at either end on the ports which should be receiving traffic
awt[asciilifeform]: receiving or sending, that is
whaack[asciilifeform]: hm i thought it was like "echo -n "hello" >/dev/udp/192.168.1.102/8000"
whaack[asciilifeform]: i can do that on my irc box and i canot do it on my bot's box... may be telling
awt[asciilifeform]: oh yeah there's that as well.
whaack[asciilifeform]: completely confused
whaack[asciilifeform]: i can send garbage udps between the two and they correctly detect the garbage
whaack[asciilifeform]: but when they send legit msgs via blatta neither side sees anything from the other
signpost[asciilifeform]: might be time to step the thing through a debugger.
signpost[asciilifeform]: intellij's is pretty great for pycode.
whaack[asciilifeform]: test
awt[asciilifeform]: yeah you could put a breakpoint where data is read from the udp port for a sanity check
whaack[asciilifeform]: i wonder if there is anyway there is some problem with the name of my computer on my bots end being 'whaack'
whaack[asciilifeform]: might do debugger later, ready to throw in the towel soon
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2022-07-08 17:41:04 phf[billymg]: http://glyf.org/screenshots/pest-poc.png some assembly required
whaack[asciilifeform]: thank goodness
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-height
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: got them to peer, should i guess that my bot is going to be spammed with getdata and thus will not be operable?
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: block_height: 744203
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: mins_since_last_block: 6
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-height
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: during the getdata sync blatta crashed and gave this error http://paste.deedbot.org/?id=cj38
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-height
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-height
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-height
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-height
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-tx 0 0
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-height
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: bot managed to respond before, but now when it tries to send a msg i get 'Aborting message: unknown handle: #aleth'
whaack[asciilifeform]: billymg: maybe you have seen something like this?
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-tx 0 0
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: seems like the problem si that blatta thinks #aleth is a direct message instead of to a channel
awt[asciilifeform]: where is #aleth coming from?
awt[asciilifeform]: whaack ^
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: it's the target of my bot, but the bot did not join the channel #aleth, so i think that is the confusion
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-height
whaack[asciilifeform]: anyone else get join/part spam specifically from billymg?
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: block_height: 744206
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: mins_since_last_block: 20
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-tx 0 0
whaack[asciilifeform]: i think i may have crashed other blattas by sending an empty message
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-height
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e help
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: block_height: 744206
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: mins_since_last_block: 23
awt[asciilifeform]: I'm still here
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e help
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: whaack: my valid commands are: src, uptime, version, help, view-height, view-address, view-utxos, view-balance, view-block, view-raw-block, view-tx, view-raw-tx, push
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: cool
whaack[asciilifeform]: not sure why my bot is finnicky but i am guessing it is because it is being hit with spam from getdata
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: whaack: my valid commands are: src, uptime, version, help, view-height, view-address, view-utxos, view-balance, view-block, view-raw-block, view-tx, view-raw-tx, push
whaack[asciilifeform]: atm it's super laggy
whaack[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: !e view-height
whaack[asciilifeform]: !c help
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: block_height: 744206
whaack[asciilifeform]: everything showed up in logger delayed as well
crawlerbot[asciilifeform]: whaack[billymg|billymg]: my valid commands are: src, uptime, help, net-summary, version, trb-status
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: mins_since_last_block: 29
awt[asciilifeform]: likely the case
asciilifeform: http://logs.nosuchlabs.com/log/pest/2022-07-08#1008834 << nifty, precisely as asciilifeform pictured it
dulapbot: Logged on 2022-07-08 17:40:59 phf[asciilifeform]: http://glyf.org/screenshots/pest-poc.png some assembly required
whaack[asciilifeform]: awt: probably because my blockexplorer started sending getdata requests
awt[asciilifeform]: Somehow I got knocked into GETDATA mode as well
awt[asciilifeform]: whaack: likely because a response from the bot had a forked netchain value
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-block 1337
asciilifeform: http://logs.nosuchlabs.com/log/pest/2022-07-08#1008832 << this aint difficult to arrange (anybody can start a net). however, see also.
dulapbot: Logged on 2022-07-08 17:38:52 signpost[asciilifeform]: asciilifeform, yep. it'd also be nice to have side channels where conversation doesn't go straight to public loggers.
dulapbot: (asciilifeform) 2022-03-31 asciilifeform: verisimilitude: there's an ukr joak, 'one ukr -- is a fine fella. two ukrs -- best buds. three ukrs -- is a partizan brigade with a traitor'
dulapbot: (trilema) 2015-04-14 ascii_field: 'what three know, the sow knows' (TM)
asciilifeform: moar folx historically burned by assumption of seekrecy in a group than by just about anyffin
dulapbot: Logged on 2022-07-08 17:52:20 phf[asciilifeform]: that is remote station keeps track of state, and you can connect to it with a rich interface of some sort
asciilifeform would still like an integrated client where cut&paste work (i.e. xorg proggy) but not expects any time soon, is over9000 sweat
asciilifeform: !e view-height
asciilifeform: hm
awt[asciilifeform]: syncing
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: block_height: 744206
asciilifeform bbl,meat
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: mins_since_last_block: 42
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e help
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: whaack: my valid commands are: src, uptime, version, help, view-height, view-address, view-utxos, view-balance, view-block, view-raw-block, view-tx, view-raw-tx, push
whaack[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: !e view-balance 16ftSEQ4ctQFDtVZiUBusQUjRrGhM3JYwe
whaack[asciilifeform]: From Top 500 Richest Bitcoin Addresses | 99 Bitcoins
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: block_height: 744206
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: value_sats: 2917714
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: value_btc: 0.02917714
whaack[asciilifeform]: haha whooops
whaack[asciilifeform]: !e view-balance 16ftSEQ4ctQFDtVZiUBusQUjRrGhM3JYwe
whaack[asciilifeform]: From Top 500 Richest Bitcoin Addresses | 99 Bitcoins
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: block_height: 744206
trbexplorer[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: value_btc: 0.02917714
trbexplorer[asciilifeform|asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: value_sats: 2917714
trbexplorer[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: block_height: 744206
trbexplorer[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: value_btc: 0.00015551
trbexplorer[asciilifeform|asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: value_sats: 15551
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: block_height: 744206
trbexplorer[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: value_btc: 132323.54391824
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: value_sats: 13232354391824
whaack[asciilifeform|asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: !e view-balance 16rCmCmbuWDhPjWTrpQGaU3EPdZF7MTdUk
whaack[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: !e view-balance 1P5ZEDWTKTFGxQjZphgWPQUpe554WKDfHQ
whaack[asciilifeform]: done spamming
signpost[asciilifeform]: hey shinohai, what's your current AT?
signpost[asciilifeform]: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2022-07-08#1008744 << yep, no argument to contrary. would want a future item to introduce more secrecy, not less.
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2022-07-08 20:02:46 asciilifeform[billymg]: moar folx historically burned by assumption of seekrecy in a group than by just about anyffin
shinohai[asciilifeform]: signpost: 67.205.140.207/7778
signpost[asciilifeform]: ty, updated
shinohai[asciilifeform]: !e view-balance 1MyfLJS8ZKw5zS6cjdiEVM69i8ZwCaDVM6
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: block_height: 744206
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: value_sats: 0
signpost[asciilifeform]: awt: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2022-07-08#1008739 << what does the duplicate billymg mean here?
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2022-07-08 20:00:56 crawlerbot[billymg|billymg]: whaack[billymg|billymg]: my valid commands are: src, uptime, help, net-summary, version, trb-status
trbexplorer[asciilifeform]: value_btc: 0.00000000
signpost[asciilifeform|asciilifeform]: does that mean his station passed that message to itself once?
signpost[asciilifeform]: curious because I've never been able to get a peering going with him.
awt[asciilifeform]: signpost: the order buffer on versions up to 9976 doesn't expect duplicate messages, so doesn't dedup handles properly when for example when for some reason ...
awt[asciilifeform]: multiple GETDATA requests are triggered for the same message and multiple responses are received.
signpost[asciilifeform]: ah ok
signpost[asciilifeform] setting up over here with the intellij debugger so I can stop asking lazy questions
awt[asciilifeform]: or something close to that. I have a version here that prevents that from happening but haven't yet published
phf[asciilifeform]: foo
phf[asciilifeform]: still working?
signpost[asciilifeform]: yup, can read ya.
phf[asciilifeform]: doesn't seem to barf on newlines, but i actually sent foo~%bar. probably should handle it on my side, but perhaps needs to be a clarification in spec
phf[asciilifeform]: И҆ вни́де ї҆и҃съ въ це́рковь бж҃їю и҆ и҆згна̀ всѧ҄ продаю́щыѧ и҆ кѹпѹ́ющыѧ въ це́ркви, и҆ трапє́зы торжникѡ́мъ и҆спрове́рже и҆ сѣда҄лища продаю́щихъ гѡ́лѹби, и҆ гл҃а и҆̀мъ: пи́
shinohai[asciilifeform]: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2022-07-08#1008797 << I have nfi why but he's only person here I have not yet successfully peered with.
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2022-07-08 20:37:47 signpost: curious because I've never been able to get a peering going with him.
dulapbot: Logged on 2022-07-08 21:12:42 phf[asciilifeform]: И҆ вни́де ї҆и҃съ въ це́рковь бж҃їю и҆ и҆згна̀ всѧ҄ продаю́щыѧ и҆ кѹпѹ́ющыѧ въ це́ркви, и҆ трапє́зы торжникѡ́мъ и҆спрове́рже и҆ сѣда҄лища продаю́щихъ гѡ́лѹби, и҆ гл҃а и҆̀мъ: пи́
asciilifeform: ... weirdly enuff, the echo bombed asciilifeform's local blatta
asciilifeform: but not the 1 on dulapnet
asciilifeform: ( and phf's original bombed neither )
asciilifeform: awt ^
phf[asciilifeform]: could also be the newline that bombed it
asciilifeform: possib
phf[asciilifeform]: foo
asciilifeform: not blew yet
dulapbot: Logged on 2022-07-08 21:46:12 phf[asciilifeform]: foo
asciilifeform: phf: blew on echo
asciilifeform: ( and only on asciilifeform's station , again )
asciilifeform: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xd0 in position 75: ordinal not in range(128)
asciilifeform: in deliver
asciilifeform: self.client.message_from_station(message)
asciilifeform: File "/home/stas/blatta/blatta/blatta/lib/client.py", line 50, in message_from_station
asciilifeform: self.__writebuffer += formatted_message + "\r\n"
phf[asciilifeform]: can't help you there fam
asciilifeform: possib enuff clue in there for awt to have moment of upsight
phf[asciilifeform]: i'm working on proper text break, so that i can quote the Word of God properly
asciilifeform: a++
phf[asciilifeform]: hmm, i've not gotten either messages from dulapbot, e.g. http://logs.nosuchlabs.com/log/pest/2022-07-08#1009020
dulapbot: Logged on 2022-07-08 21:46:41 dulapbot: Logged on 2022-07-08 21:46:12 phf[asciilifeform]: foo