Show Idle (>14 d.) Chans

← 2019-12-22 | 2019-12-24 →
feedbot: << Qntra -- 2 Chinese Vessels Among Ships Attacked By Pirates In Gabon Capital's Harbor
trinque: Mocky: ack
trinque: meanwhile, fuck, ave1 did your domain expire?
mp_en_viaje: ahaha Mocky, tits or gtfo.
mp_en_viaje: wut is this java bullshit, "oh, i've been fucking three women". when!
mp_en_viaje: to be perfectly clear & understand each other : the ENTIRETY of stage, from "broadway" to "highbrow theatre" to ballet to ice skating to ~EVERYTHING ELSE~, the absolutely and strictly only reason ANYTHING like the stage exists in contemporary degeneracy,
mp_en_viaje: is that centuries ago rich and powerful men modulated their natural social competitiveness (also known as "gentle" in the gentleman, "let's compete SOME OTHER WAY than with fists and clubs", that's what it is)
mp_en_viaje: to include the competition of young women they own and trained. there's exactly no substantial difference between "showbusiness" and racing horses or "bloodsports", cockfighting, dog fighting etc.
mp_en_viaje: you own these beautiful animals which you train to compete.
mp_en_viaje: the reason lucia was ever written by donizetti (and if it weren't written by him, it'd have been written by someone else! -- not "the same" in the irrelevant, misunderstood sense of "same exact surface", "same exact stringing of notes", because IT IS NOT THE FORM OF THE ARGUMENT THAT LENDS IT CREDENCE. but same in the only meaningful way : sameness of function, lucia, "the thing tha
mp_en_viaje: t does lucia" would have been written anyway)
mp_en_viaje: is the very simple "we each have these herds of sluts we're competing" basis, upon which donizetti came and offered a useful tool : "hey guise ? ima write a piece no human female born out of human female can EVER fucking sing. it'll just be fucking impossible. you can watch them die trying, crash and burtn on the stage, all their natural girly hopes and aspirations and the rest of the coy behaviour debris eviscerated for y
mp_en_viaje: our amusement, how about it ?"
mp_en_viaje: that's what lucia fucking is, "let these bitches who think they can sing break their teeth". it was SUPPOSED to be undoable, which it's why it is. and it's not the only item in that vein, either.
mp_en_viaje: and same with theatre, and with all "entertainment" run off the backs of young women : his grace and his friends' liveried sluts.
mp_en_viaje: now don't fucking tell me you didn't understand this is both a) how human society advances and b) what the fuck we even do here.
mp_en_viaje: if it weren't for those guys, all there'd be on tv would be bronco busting, wrestling an' etcetera. look up Bonnie McCarroll & women bronc riding to see the fuck i mean.
mp_en_viaje: back in 1600 samuel pepys never missed a performance of the duke's company, he really liked mary knep, guess how the fuck he ever got to know she existed.
mp_en_viaje: there's a reason wikitards & redditards & etc waste their days away. that reason might no be, but just as well might have plenty to do with our neglect of running the slut competitions.
feedbot: << Krankendenken -- A brief look into Portage and ebuilds
mp_en_viaje: and that clown alf thought starting a home business was "suicide mission".
mp_en_viaje: whaack, hey, that's not even bad.
mp_en_viaje: i had a list of these to get to later, now's that later, boy howdy what a string. apparently this dcu thing's working out.
diana_coman: lolz, so Mocky's rabbit hole was more of a chicken coop?
ossabot: Logged on 2019-09-04 22:48:05 Mocky: I fell down a rabbit hole
mp_en_viaje: you know why rabbits sleep with their eyes open, btw ?
diana_coman: no idea on rabbity things.
mp_en_viaje: they have very little skin.
mp_en_viaje: if they close their eyes, the foreskin retracts.
diana_coman: - fwiw, I read through this deed; I hope that is not all of "making the case" as BingoBoingo_ sees it.
ossabot: Logged on 2019-12-21 23:41:51 BingoBoingo: !!deed
mp_en_viaje: dorion_road, can you explain the difference between imminence and immanence ?
BingoBoingo: diana_coman: MPEx is built on GPG contracts upheld voluntarily. Introducing "these GPG contracts must be upheld always and forever no matter the cost as if they were fiat contracts" would be subversion. For that, in representing the claim I can't say "This must be paid no matter what" or other constructions along that line without attacking a
BingoBoingo: fundamental part of what makes the Republic.
BingoBoingo: diana_coman: GPG contracts are such that a case can only be so strong without hallucinating a denial of the fundamental difference between GPG contracts and fiat contracts.
diana_coman: BingoBoingo: dunno who do you think was hallucinating that GPG contracts = fiat contracts or something but sure/
BingoBoingo: diana_coman: I don't think anyone present here in is hallucinating that, but not all log readers are here.
diana_coman: ftr, I wasn't either asking for or indeed expecting the sort of "this must be paid no matter what", no idea where you took that from.
BingoBoingo: diana_coman: I apologize for addressing points for the record in a manner that appears to be addressing them to you specifically.
diana_coman: BingoBoingo: no worries.
mp_en_viaje: BingoBoingo, i don't get it, so the idea is i should pay money because you say so ?
BingoBoingo: mp_en_viaje: I'm not saying whether you should pay the money or not. I am saying it would be consistent with the way you've worn the MPEx CEO hat before to pay. You, ultimately, are free to decide to pay or not pay. My client paid me to introduce his interests to the forum, otherwise his interests would have gone unrepresented and certainly unpaid.
mp_en_viaje: but what ~THE~ money are we talking about ?
mp_en_viaje: which the ?
mp_en_viaje: so far it'd seem you expect your signing something you wrote yest retroactively produces some the money however long ago ?
mp_en_viaje: the basis for a claim tuesday can't be a document signed thursday. even if whoever signs it has the autority, which i dun see how you have here.
mp_en_viaje: you're not even a witness here, to be producing something like say the smickles affidavit. so far the only way that thing can be classified as is a letter of credit, i guess ? you're saying i should give mike_c some dough as you think he's good for it ?
BingoBoingo: mp_en_viaje: I'll request mike_c produce his last statement issued by MPEx
mp_en_viaje: do that ; add to it a plain statement of your involvement, and we can take it from there.
BingoBoingo: mp_en_viaje: Thank you for your patience.
feedbot: << Ossa Sepia -- Foxy's Unshaded Skin and Side Effects (Notes on Graphics in Eulora, VIII)
mp_en_viaje: diana_coman, oooo
mp_en_viaje: dis is beautiful
diana_coman: mp_en_viaje: the side effects? lol.
deedbot: accepted: 1
ossabot: Logged on 2019-12-23 14:26:49 BingoBoingo: !!deed
lobbesbot: BingoBoingo: The operation succeeded.
dorion_road: << I couldn't when I read the question. I looked into the etymology and gather imminence refers to projection and immanence refers to inherence.
ossabot: Logged on 2019-12-23 07:48:16 mp_en_viaje: dorion_road, can you explain the difference between imminence and immanence ?
mp_en_viaje: right, imminence is being in the very near future ; immanence is the essential tight coupling tying essences to phenomenology.
mp_en_viaje: you ever read the essences series ?
mp_en_viaje: anyway, the latter immediately loads a kantian context, much like saying "subconscious" loads freudian.
deedbot: accepted: 1
ossabot: Logged on 2019-12-23 19:08:47 BingoBoingo: !!deed
lobbesbot: BingoBoingo: The operation succeeded.
← 2019-12-22 | 2019-12-24 →