awt[asciilifeform]: asciilifeform, phf: are you doing any paging out of the db for the gui? Or all in memory?
phf: awt, i don't have a db. and the only person who knows, at the moment, is jonsykkel, because his pest properly tracks chains. i initially kept packets in a memory mmaped file vector, but after rewriting with an online graph, i realized i need to rethink storage.
phf: i'm not really doing "proper architecture", like with btcbase this pest version is opportunity to try out various alternative approaches, even if they wouldn't make sense in Real Programs. for all i know the "rethought storage" will end up some kind of graph database, where i do on
phf: ly partial khan walk (the more you walk, the more data is lifted from storage to memory? smt like that)
phf: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2023-04-22#1025580 << that's not a reason not to bants
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2023-04-22 10:30:25 signpost: picked up a new fiat gig, will be eating some attention for a while as I ramp up.
awt[asciilifeform]: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2023-05-06#1025803 << what does "properly tracks chains" mean here (trying to figure out if blatta does this)?
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2023-05-06 19:17:52 phf[4]: awt, i don't have a db. and the only person who knows, at the moment, is jonsykkel, because his pest properly tracks chains. i initially kept packets in a memory mmaped file vector, but after rewriting with an online graph, i realized i need to rethink storage.
phf: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2023-05-06#1025808 << it's section 5.4.1.2 of predraft, “If the originator believes that he is sending a BroadcastText to the net for the first time, SelfChain may be set to equal Zero[32]. However, in this case, every receiver of the Message will be warned28 of this fact.”
bitbot[asciilifeform]: Logged on 2023-05-06 20:40:39 awt: http://logs.bitdash.io/pest/2023-05-06#1025803 << what does "properly tracks chains" mean here (trying to figure out if blatta does this)?